
When it involves hurting our economy precisely who's worse, International Terrorists of Large Unions? The reason I ask is easy, you notice we are in a Presidential Election year, with less than one hundred-days to go, and the two candidates are talking approximately outsourcing American Jobs and debating why corporations are leaving the US and seeking much less antagonistic commercial enterprise environments; decrease company taxes, few magnificence action lawsuits, less difficult regulations, and less grief from unions. Okay so let's talk about who's clearly hurting our financial system lets?
There turned into an interesting article that regarded in News and World Report on September 7, 2015 titled: "With settlement expiration nearing, UAW leader says he hasn't picked an automobile company to target," via Tom Krisher, Associated Press Auto Writer - which said:
At the time of that article approximately one-yr ago - The UAW (United Auto Workers) president stated he hasn't determined, or THEY haven't determined which vehicle organisation to TARGET yet. WOW, some other area in our economy and they would face a Federal Indictment for conspiring on this manner. I am frustrated with the double-standards we've on this Great Nation. It's pathetic to permit the UAW to do that. Totally pathetic, Ayn Rand became proper. Is this actually approximately collective bargaining or is this approximately collective terrorizing.
And, what occurs if agencies don't acquiesce? Simple, the union individuals will act like thugs, vandalize vehicles of "scabs" those workers who move the picket lines, and harass control, component time workers and lobby to get government to are available and over alter and first-rate the groups into exhaustion until they surrender and pay up. Wow, so what's the definition of terrorism once more?
"The use of violence and intimidation within the pursuit of political targets."
Yep, it truly is the definition and it positive fits those moves would not it? So, if the democrats sponsor big labor unions, does that imply they may be sponsoring terrorism? Well? Does it?
No comments:
Post a Comment